Hi all, Good initiative. I would be happy to refactor the sensors package. I started on it but it changes a lot, all the imports will break.
https://github.com/apache/incubator-airflow/pull/2875 What do you guys think? Cheers, Fokko 2017-12-14 20:09 GMT+01:00 Chris Riccomini <[email protected]>: > I have created a wiki here: > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/AIRFLOW/Airflow+2.0 > > To track features and progress. > > On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 11:08 AM, Chris Riccomini <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > Re: #2: Is there a current ticket out for removing the legacy import > > style? > > > > No, I don't think so, but you can create one! :) > > > > On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 11:06 AM, Andy Hadjigeorgiou < > [email protected] > > > wrote: > > > >> This sounds great, something I'd like to see updated for 2.0 release (or > >> before) is the Airflow documentation > >> <http://airflow.readthedocs.io/en/latest/installation.html> ( > >> http://airflow.readthedocs.io/en/latest/installation.html). It seems > that > >> updating the repo does not update this site - and given that we will be > >> removing certain deprecated features I imagine the docs will change > >> substantially. > >> > >> Re: #2: Is there a current ticket out for removing the legacy import > >> style? > >> I'm happy to help drive that forward. > >> > >> - Andy > >> > >> On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 1:55 PM, Chris Riccomini <[email protected] > > > >> wrote: > >> > >> > Hey all, > >> > > >> > With 1.9.0 wrapping up soon (hopefully), there's been some discussion > on > >> > the having the next release be Airflow 2.0 (rather than 1.10). This > >> would > >> > allow us to break compatibility, and clean up some stuff. Proposed > >> things > >> > to include in 2.0 are: > >> > > >> > 1) New webserver that Joy Gao has been working on. > >> > 2) Remove the legacy import style that's been deprecated since at > least > >> 1.8 > >> > 3) New timzone feature > >> > 4) Move API out of experimental > >> > > >> > I want to keep the list fairly tight, preferably to things that have > >> > already been done, so that we can ship it fairly quickly (in the next > >> > couple of months). > >> > > >> > Does this sound like a good list? > >> > > >> > Cheers, > >> > Chris > >> > > >> > > > > >
