The fix for the on_kill method for all the operators should really be included in the 1.10 release. https://github.com/apache/incubator-airflow/pull/2975
On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 8:52 PM, Chris Riccomini <[email protected]> wrote: > Hey all, > > Now that the RBAC UI has been merged in, I wanted to revive this thread > again. Timezone stuff has been in for a while. I'm not sure on the status > of the K8s stuff, but I do feel it's time to start getting the ball rolling > on a 1.10 release. What do others think? Any volunteers for a release > manager? :) > > Cheers, > Chris > > On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 12:42 PM, George Leslie-Waksman < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > +1 > > > > On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 11:08 AM Joy Gao <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > The new FAB UI does not modify the existing API (i.e. www2/api/ will > be a > > > copy of www/api/), and the endpoints are registered as blueprints to > the > > > flask app the same way as before, so it is fully backward compatible. > > > > > > Although FAB offers REST APIs on the models out-of-the-box, it > currently > > is > > > still in BETA and does not support any HTTP authentication scheme, > > meaning > > > it would require a cookie to mimic a normal user session in order to be > > > used. In the long run (for Airflow 2.X+), I believe the best approach > is > > to > > > patch FAB with auth backends, so we can apply @has_access annotation on > > all > > > rest endpoints to streamline authentication. For 1.10, the current > plan > > is > > > to leave the API as is. I wouldn't recommend folks to use the FAB-based > > > REST APIs yet. I would also like to release the new UI as an alpha > > version, > > > and wait for 2.0 before promoting it to the default version. This will > > give > > > us some time to address any new UI bugs which I overlooked. > > > > > > +1 on polishing! (With the exception of "*Rest Api should standardise > and > > > have proper swagger definitions" and any other bugs that require major > > > overhaul*, which I think can wait until 2.0) > > > > > > > > > On Sun, Jan 14, 2018 at 12:18 PM, Bolke de Bruin <[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Chris, Joy, > > > > > > > > Can you shed some light on the backward compatibility of the new UI, > > > > particularly with regards to the API? The API for example cannot use > > the > > > > login from FAB afaik. > > > > > > > > As much of the work is already in for 1.10 I think focus should be on > > > > polishing. There are some minor quirks and slightly annoying bugs. > > > > > > > > - It seems a dag with schedule “none” can still run when turned on > from > > > > the UI (unconfirmed) > > > > - Exceptions are swallowed when importing a custom logging conf > > > > - UI only displays UTC > > > > - Logging ends up duplicated (fixed in master) > > > > - Tasks instantiated outside airflow do not set default time zone > > > (@msumit) > > > > - Log file retrieval feels archaic (non local?) > > > > - Rest Api should standardise and have proper swagger definitions > > > > > > > > And probably some others. > > > > > > > > Bolke > > > > > > > > > On 14 Jan 2018, at 15:41, Driesprong, Fokko <[email protected]> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > I think 1.10 is a good idea. I'm working on this refactoring of the > > > > sensor > > > > > structure: https://github.com/apache/incubator-airflow/pull/2875 > > > > > > > > > > Would be awesome to get this in. At my current project we use > sensors > > > in > > > > a > > > > > few places, but still there is some work to be done. For example, > > don't > > > > > allocate an executor slot to the sensors, but have a more > > sophisticated > > > > way > > > > > of poking. > > > > > > > > > > Cheers, Fokko > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2018-01-12 21:19 GMT+01:00 Chris Riccomini <[email protected] > >: > > > > > > > > > >> Just the operator (AIRFLOW-1517) > > > > >> > > > > >> On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 11:21 AM, Anirudh Ramanathan < > > > > >> [email protected]> wrote: > > > > >> > > > > >>> Sounds awesome. Is k8s support here referring to both the > executor > > > and > > > > >> the > > > > >>> operator? > > > > >>> > > > > >>> Thanks, > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> On Jan 12, 2018 11:18 AM, "Sid Anand" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > >>> > > > > >>>> +1 > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 10:56 AM, Chris Riccomini < > > > > >> [email protected] > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> wrote: > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>>> Hey all, > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> After some past discussion on Airflow 1.10 vs 2.0, I think > we've > > > > >>>> converged > > > > >>>>> on a 1.10 as the next step. 1.10 will include: > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> * Timezone changes > > > > >>>>> * Kubernetes support > > > > >>>>> * New UI > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> The first two have been merged in, as I saw Bolke just merged > K8s > > > (I > > > > >>> saw > > > > >>>> a > > > > >>>>> few follow-on patches coming, though), and I think the new UI > is > > > > >>>> probably a > > > > >>>>> couple of weeks out from a PR on master. > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> What do people think of starting the release process on master > in > > > > >> Feb? > > > > >>>>> Given that it took a month last time, I expect 1.10 to be > > released > > > in > > > > >>>>> March. Thoughts? > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> Cheers, > > > > >>>>> Chris > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- *Milan van der Meer* *Software Engineer*www.riaktr.com *| Brussels Office**BE *+32 498 45 96 22 <0032498459622>* | Skype * *milan.vandermeer.ria*
