LGTM. I confirmed the issue Igor mentioned, and confirmed that there are no other statuses besides "review" that are not present on the new tracker.
On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 6:14 AM, Igor Bondarenko <[email protected]> wrote: > Looks great! Existing user accounts are linked, really cool! > > There's one minor inconsistency, though. Tickets with 'code-review' status > imported as 'review'. And if you'll try to edit such ticket, 'open' will be > selected by default for a status, since there are no 'review' in status > options at all. E.g. > https://forge-allura.apache.org/p/allura/tickets/7704/ > > On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 6:06 AM, Alex Luberg <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > I think it looks great, have checked a few older milestones, most popular > > user accounts were created and now linked with posts, cool! > > > > On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 8:41 AM, Dave Brondsema <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > I have exported Allura tickets from SourceForge and imported them to > > > https://forge-allura.apache.org/p/allura/tickets/ Check it out, how > > > does it > > > look? You will need to log in to view them, since this isn't our final > > > run. > > > Anyone can create an account though. > > > > > > The import was filtered down to Allura-related tickets (no SF internal > > > stuff) > > > and milestones were changed from SourceForge development sprints to our > > > release > > > version numbers. Also the "size" custom field (used for SourceForge > > > planning) > > > was converted to a label, so it is not as prominent. I created > accounts > > > for > > > some top users, so their usernames match. Other usernames will just > show > > > "Originally created by: username". > > > > > > How does it look? Anything look amiss, or could be improved? > > > > > > P.S. it took about 10 hours to run the import! > > > > > > -- > > > Dave Brondsema : [email protected] > > > http://www.brondsema.net : personal > > > http://www.splike.com : programming > > > <>< > > > > > >
