Yeah, I tried to sort out the easiest way, and tried to evaluate a change in sorting of the discussions, against a separate Q&A tool.
But I have the feeling, that a separate tool has many advantages. Am Fr., 30. Nov. 2018, 16:57 hat Dave Brondsema <d...@brondsema.net> geschrieben: > On 11/25/18 3:27 AM, Ingo Hornberger wrote: > > Thanks for your feedback! > > > > 1) > > Actually I already found the new config settings for the emotis. But > > personally I think they should be direct buttons, as the Menü below the > > smiley icon wasn't intuitive to me. > > > > 1/2) > > I think all this should be configurable in the admin sections of the > tools > > instead of the config file. > > > > Yea that sound like it could be a nice option if you have few emojis. > Obviously > if there are many emojis having them all listed could be too much. > > > I want to have this mainly for the forum (aka Discussion). The intention > is > > to turn it into a crowd sourced Q&A tool with ratings. > > My current alternative is to do a fork of it. Which is also not the worst > > option. > > > > I just wanted to know if it is of public interest. > > That does sound interesting to me. I think it would take some significant > changes to sort replies in a different order than they are right now > (especially > considering nested replies). Are you thinking of the Q&A tool as a > separate > tool altogether? That sounds like it might be better, compared to > customizing > the general reply threads that are used everywhere. > > > > > Am So., 25. Nov. 2018, 05:24 hat Shalitha Suranga < > shalithasura...@gmail.com> > > geschrieben: > > > >> Hi Ingo > >> > >> 1) Reaction feature is customizable. means that you will be able to > change > >> reaction emoji list via ini. Uncomment reactions.emoji_list key in your > ini > >> file > >> and add only +1, -1 as per below > >> > >> reactions.emoji_list = :+1:, :-1: > >> > >> This enables only thumbs_up and thumbs_down in every reaction > >> > >> 2) Currently Allura has only react and view feature. User can react and > see > >> the react > >> counts also. I think your idea is good to give option to sort by +1 > >> reactions. > >> > >> Can some other members also advice more regarding this? > >> > >> Thanks > >> > >> > >> On Fri, Nov 23, 2018 at 2:25 AM Ingo Hornberger <in...@gmx.net> wrote: > >> > >>> Hi Guys, > >>> > >>> I just checked out the reaction feature, and have two issues with it, > >> where > >>> one of you might be able to help me: > >>> > >>> 1) Style of the reaction-buttons. > >>> I don't want to have more than +1 / -1. And thus I want to have them as > >>> direct access buttons. From my point of view, this increases the > >> intuitive > >>> usability much. > >>> Does it make sense to make this configurable? > >>> > >>> 2) Sorting of discussion theads > >>> I digged a bit in the discussion controllers and models, but sadly > didn't > >>> get the full picture, yet. > >>> What I was wondering is, if it is possible somehow to sort discussion > >>> theads based on the reaction_counts. Maybe also in a configurable way. > I > >>> guess, that it actually has to be the sum of +1 and -1 votes. > >>> > >>> This would allow the users to push the best answers to the top. > >>> > >>> Cheers, > >>> Ingo > >>> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Regards, > >> *Shalitha Suranga* > >> shalithasuranga.github.io > >> > > > > > > -- > Dave Brondsema : d...@brondsema.net > http://www.brondsema.net : personal > http://www.splike.com : programming > <>< >
