-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/19687/#review38622
-----------------------------------------------------------

Ship it!


Ship It!

- Sid Wagle


On March 26, 2014, 4:46 p.m., John Speidel wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/19687/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated March 26, 2014, 4:46 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Ambari, Nate Cole, Sid Wagle, and Tom Beerbower.
> 
> 
> Bugs: AMBARI-5206
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMBARI-5206
> 
> 
> Repository: ambari
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> In core-site, there are a bunch of proxyuser settings.
> 
> These are in the form of :
> hadoop.proxyuser.<username>.hosts
> hadoop.proxyuser.<username>.groups
> 
> These are dynamically generated property names because they contain the user 
> name in the property name.
> These are currently not present in the stack definitions and are generated by 
> the UI.
> 
> These are currently not being set when provisioning via a blueprint.
> 
> Until this is completed, users that deploy clusters that require proxy user 
> properties will have to add them to the blueprint manually.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   
> ambari-server/src/main/java/org/apache/ambari/server/controller/internal/ClusterResourceProvider.java
>  8afee6e 
>   
> ambari-server/src/test/java/org/apache/ambari/server/controller/internal/ClusterResourceProviderTest.java
>  ca881d4 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/19687/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> unit tests:
> - Updated existing unit test
> - Ran all unit tests with one failure that I have determined to be unrelated
> -- Will rerun unit tests prior to pushing change
> 
> functional tests:
> - confirmed that proxy user configurations were set and that the oozie 
> service test was successful
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> John Speidel
> 
>

Reply via email to