-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/20724/#review41511
-----------------------------------------------------------

Ship it!


I guess we are counting on the fact that we haven't yet documented the new 
stacks API.  Is there still a small chance that we break somebody using stacks?

- Tom Beerbower


On April 25, 2014, 7:25 p.m., John Speidel wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/20724/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated April 25, 2014, 7:25 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Ambari, Sid Wagle and Tom Beerbower.
> 
> 
> Bugs: AMBARI-5578
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMBARI-5578
> 
> 
> Repository: ambari
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Existing names are not consistent with the remaining api which uses an '_' 
> instead of camel case. 
> Also these names are unnecessarily long. Since these names are not under the 
> cluster resource, it is ok to reuse the names service and component for a 
> more concise url.
> So, the new stack api hierarchy would be:
> stacks/versions/services/components/...
> stacks/versions/operating_systems/...
> 
> Note This will not affect the stacks2 api that the UI uses.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   
> ambari-server/src/main/java/org/apache/ambari/server/api/services/StacksService.java
>  7c5eaf4 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/20724/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Functional testing:
> - created cluster via blueprint
> - tested UI functionality
> 
> Unit tests:
> Successfully ran unit tests
> 
> Results :
> 
> Tests run: 1570, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 9
> 
> ...
> 
> [INFO] 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> [INFO] BUILD SUCCESS
> [INFO] 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> [INFO] Total time: 18:46.259s
> [INFO] Finished at: Fri Apr 25 15:07:17 EDT 2014
> [INFO] Final Memory: 20M/123M
> [INFO] 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> John Speidel
> 
>

Reply via email to