-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/21177/#review42450
-----------------------------------------------------------

Ship it!


Ship It!

- Sid Wagle


On May 7, 2014, 10:05 p.m., John Speidel wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/21177/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated May 7, 2014, 10:05 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Ambari and Sid Wagle.
> 
> 
> Bugs: AMBARI-5706
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMBARI-5706
> 
> 
> Repository: ambari
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Do simple validation for cluster create with blueprint.
> 
> Validate the following:
> - invalid blueprint name
> - no host_groups field
> - host group without name
> - host group without hosts
> - host group hosts without fqdn
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   
> ambari-server/src/main/java/org/apache/ambari/server/controller/internal/ClusterResourceProvider.java
>  f459f3c 
>   
> ambari-server/src/test/java/org/apache/ambari/server/controller/internal/ClusterResourceProviderTest.java
>  e644b08 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/21177/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Functional Testing:
> Tested that the above conditions resulted is the appropriate responses.
> Also tested provisioning a basic cluster.
> 
> Unit Tests:
> Added new unit tests.
> All existing tests pass.
> 
> Results :
> 
> Tests run: 1597, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 9
> ...
> Total run:548
> Total errors:0
> Total failures:0
> OK
> ...
> [INFO] 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> [INFO] BUILD SUCCESS
> [INFO] 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> [INFO] Total time: 18:17.020s
> [INFO] Finished at: Wed May 07 17:58:49 EDT 2014
> [INFO] Final Memory: 20M/123M
> [INFO] 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> John Speidel
> 
>

Reply via email to