-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/22029/#review44690
-----------------------------------------------------------

Ship it!


Ship It!

- Jaimin Jetly


On June 3, 2014, 1:06 p.m., Jonathan Hurley wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/22029/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated June 3, 2014, 1:06 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Ambari, Jaimin Jetly, Srimanth Gunturi, and Yusaku Sako.
> 
> 
> Bugs: AMBARI-5930
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMBARI-5930
> 
> 
> Repository: ambari
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> When using a blueprint to create a cluster, there are two HBase properties 
> that are flagged as required, but empty. Since these are custom classes, the 
> fact that they are empty is probably correct (they've been empty in our stack 
> model since the beginning of time).
> 
> However, the web client code flags them as "isRequired" even though the 
> site_properties.js defines them as isRequired : false
> 
> The web client code was assuming a value of "true" even if the stack 
> definition object said they were false. The solution was to check to see if 
> that value is defined in the stack object first, and use that value.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   ambari-web/app/utils/config.js eb6febc 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/22029/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> hw10897:ambari-web jhurley$ mvn test
> ...
> 
> [INFO] 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> [INFO] BUILD SUCCESS
> [INFO] 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> [INFO] Total time: 10.019s
> [INFO] Finished at: Thu May 29 14:58:47 EDT 2014
> [INFO] Final Memory: 6M/81M
> [INFO] 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Jonathan Hurley
> 
>

Reply via email to