-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/27913/#review60989
-----------------------------------------------------------



ambari-server/src/main/java/org/apache/ambari/server/controller/internal/ViewInstanceResourceProvider.java
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/27913/#comment102431>

    Should this be a separate method called isValidationRequired() or something 
similar? It looks like this is getting the validator and then determining based 
on whether the validator is null whether or not validation is required.
    
    It's a nit, but if the validator isn't needed at this point, then a boolean 
should be enough.



ambari-server/src/main/java/org/apache/ambari/server/view/ViewRegistry.java
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/27913/#comment102432>

    Does this need to be static? It doesn't appear to be accessed statically.



ambari-server/src/main/java/org/apache/ambari/server/view/ViewRegistry.java
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/27913/#comment102433>

    Potential NPE here? Or is viewDefinition being null at this point not 
really possible?



ambari-server/src/main/java/org/apache/ambari/server/view/validation/InstanceValidationResultImpl.java
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/27913/#comment102435>

    Gson is thread-safe to reuse, but costly to instantiate. I would say make 
this static and just reuse the Gson instance that's built once.


- Jonathan Hurley


On Nov. 12, 2014, 9:11 a.m., Tom Beerbower wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/27913/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Nov. 12, 2014, 9:11 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Ambari, Alejandro Fernandez and Jonathan Hurley.
> 
> 
> Bugs: AMBARI-8295
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMBARI-8295
> 
> 
> Repository: ambari
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Proposal:
> The view framework SPI exposes a new Validator interface that could 
> optionally be implemented by the view developer. The Validator interface 
> allows the view developer to define the validation logic that gets applied 
> when a new view instance is created or updated. The interface specifies a 
> svalidate method that is passed a ViewInstanceDefinition. The given view 
> instance is the instance that is being created or updated. The validator has 
> full access to the instance definition as well as the owning view definition 
> so it can check things like parameters and properties. If the validator 
> successfully validates the given instance it simply returns. If the 
> validation fails then the validator should throw an ValidationException with 
> a message that describes the failure.
> 
> {code}
> public interface Validator {
>   /**
>    * Validate the given view instance definition.  Return {@code null} to 
> indicate that
>    * no validation was performed.
>    *
>    * @param definition  the view instance definition
>    * @param mode        the validation mode
>    *
>    * @return the instance validation result; may be {@code null}
>    */
>   public ValidationResult validateInstance(ViewInstanceDefinition definition, 
> ValidationContext mode);
> 
>   /**
>    * Validate a property of the given view instance definition.  Return 
> {@code null} to indicate that
>    * no validation was performed.
>    *
>    * @param property    the property name
>    * @param definition  the view instance definition
>    * @param mode        the validation mode
>    *
>    * @return the instance validation result; may be {@code null}
>    */
>   public ValidationResult validateProperty(String property, 
> ViewInstanceDefinition definition, ValidationContext mode);
> 
>   /**
>    * The context in which a view instance validation check is performed.
>    */
>   public enum ValidationContext {
>     PRE_CREATE,  // validation prior to creation
>     PRE_UPDATE,  // validation prior to update
>     EXISTING     // validation of an existing view instance
>   }
> }
> {code}
> 
> The context allows the framework a way to let the validator know at what 
> point in the view instance lifecycle the validation is being performed.  If a 
> validation fails during instance create (PRE_CREATE), the view framework will 
> rollback the instance creation and will fail with an appropriate response 
> (see below).  The same is true for instance update (PRE_UPDATE).  The 
> validator (if specified) will also be called during a GET of view instance 
> resources (EXISTING) and be reported back as properties of the resource in 
> the normal response. 
> 
> So, for example, a view instance may have a 'server' property.  During 
> instance creation (PRE_CREATE), the validator for the view might check the 
> 'server' property for invalid characters and fail the create if found.  After 
> an instance is created and a request to get the instance resource is made 
> (EXISTING), the validator might check to see if the server specified by the 
> 'server' property is actually reachable and fail the verify if not.  In this 
> case the view instance resource is still reachable but the fact that the 
> validation failed will show as a property in the instance resource (see 
> below).
> 
> The result of the validation for the view instance and each of its properties 
> are returned from the validator to the view framework in the validation 
> result classes ...
> {code}
> public interface ValidationResult {
> 
>   /**
>    * Determine whether or not the result is valid.
>    *
>    * @return true if the result is valid
>    */
>   public boolean isValid();
> 
>   /**
>    * Get the detail of the validation result.
>    *
>    * @return the validation result detail
>    */
>   public String getDetail();
> 
>   /**
>    * Successful validation result.
>    */
>   public static final ValidationResult SUCCESS = new ValidationResult() {
>     @Override
>     public boolean isValid() {
>       return true;
>     }
> 
>     @Override
>     public String getDetail() {
>       return "OK";
>     }
>   };
> }
> {code}
> 
> 
> If a POST or PUT for a view instance fails because of a validation check the 
> results will look something like this (note in the example that the 
> validation for one property passed while the other failed) ...
> 
> {code}
> {
>   "status": 400,
>   "message": "{"propertyResults": {
>     "cities": {
>         "valid": true,
>         "detail": "OK"
>     },
>     "units": {
>         "valid": false,
>         "detail": "Units must be either metric or imperial."
>     }
> }, "valid": false, "detail": "The instance has invalid properties."}"
> }
> {code}
> 
> 
> When a view specifies a validator, the instance resource will include the 
> properties 'validation_result' and 'property_validation_results' which will 
> be reevaluated each time the resource is requested...
> 
> {code}
> {
>   "href" : 
> "http://c6401.ambari.apache.org:8080/api/v1/views/WEATHER/versions/1.0.0/instances/EUROPE";,
>   "ViewInstanceInfo" : {
>     "instance_name" : "EUROPE",
>     ...
>     "validation_result" : {
>       "valid" : true,
>       "detail" : "OK"
>     },
>     "version" : "1.0.0",
>     "view_name" : "WEATHER",
>     ...
>     "properties" : {
>       "cities" : "London, UK;Paris;Munich",
>       "units" : "imperial"
>     },
>     "property_validation_results" : {
>       "cities" : {
>         "valid" : true,
>         "detail" : "OK"
>       },
>       "units" : {
>         "valid" : true,
>         "detail" : "OK"
>       }
>     }
>   },
> ...
> {code}
> 
> Note that in the examples above, the detail messages are provided by the view 
> Validator implementation and are specific to the view (it can be any text 
> that makes sense for that view).
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   
> ambari-server/src/main/java/org/apache/ambari/server/controller/internal/BaseProvider.java
>  b4d582a 
>   
> ambari-server/src/main/java/org/apache/ambari/server/controller/internal/ViewInstanceResourceProvider.java
>  3f62cc3 
>   
> ambari-server/src/main/java/org/apache/ambari/server/orm/entities/ViewEntity.java
>  d42e1a0 
>   
> ambari-server/src/main/java/org/apache/ambari/server/orm/entities/ViewInstanceEntity.java
>  efa2818 
>   ambari-server/src/main/java/org/apache/ambari/server/view/ViewRegistry.java 
> a5d11bd 
>   
> ambari-server/src/main/java/org/apache/ambari/server/view/configuration/ViewConfig.java
>  3a23ea7 
>   
> ambari-server/src/main/java/org/apache/ambari/server/view/validation/InstanceValidationResultImpl.java
>  PRE-CREATION 
>   
> ambari-server/src/main/java/org/apache/ambari/server/view/validation/ValidationResultImpl.java
>  PRE-CREATION 
>   
> ambari-server/src/test/java/org/apache/ambari/server/controller/internal/BaseProviderTest.java
>  fc8acd0 
>   
> ambari-server/src/test/java/org/apache/ambari/server/orm/entities/ViewEntityTest.java
>  965cebb 
>   
> ambari-server/src/test/java/org/apache/ambari/server/orm/entities/ViewInstanceEntityTest.java
>  08aea6e 
>   
> ambari-server/src/test/java/org/apache/ambari/server/view/configuration/ViewConfigTest.java
>  f6ec403 
>   
> ambari-server/src/test/java/org/apache/ambari/server/view/validation/InstanceValidationResultImplTest.java
>  PRE-CREATION 
>   
> ambari-server/src/test/java/org/apache/ambari/server/view/validation/ValidationResultImplTest.java
>  PRE-CREATION 
>   
> ambari-views/src/main/java/org/apache/ambari/view/validation/ValidationResult.java
>  PRE-CREATION 
>   ambari-views/src/main/java/org/apache/ambari/view/validation/Validator.java 
> PRE-CREATION 
>   ambari-views/src/main/resources/view.xsd b95e4ec 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/27913/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Manual tests.
> 
> New unit tests added.  All existing tests pass ...
> 
> Results :
> 
> Tests run: 2244, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 14
> 
> 
> [INFO] 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> [INFO] BUILD SUCCESS
> [INFO] 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> [INFO] Total time: 24:20 min
> [INFO] Finished at: 2014-11-12T07:51:20-05:00
> [INFO] Final Memory: 41M/351M
> [INFO] 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Tom Beerbower
> 
>

Reply via email to