[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMBARI-8769?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14250809#comment-14250809
 ] 

Hudson commented on AMBARI-8769:
--------------------------------

FAILURE: Integrated in Ambari-trunk-Commit #1243 (See 
[https://builds.apache.org/job/Ambari-trunk-Commit/1243/])
AMBARI-8769. Aggregator checkpoint logic should take into account the 
checkPointDelay. Rat check fix. (swagle: 
http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=ambari.git&a=commit&h=24493d3cf122db8d5b1ed3fb96c09c4a4609827d)
* 
ambari-metrics/ambari-metrics-timelineservice/src/test/java/org/apache/hadoop/yarn/server/applicationhistoryservice/metrics/timeline/AbstractTimelineAggregatorTest.java


> Aggregator checkpoint logic should take into account the checkPointDelay
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: AMBARI-8769
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMBARI-8769
>             Project: Ambari
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: ambari-metrics
>    Affects Versions: 2.0.0
>            Reporter: Siddharth Wagle
>            Assignee: Siddharth Wagle
>             Fix For: 2.0.0
>
>         Attachments: AMBARI-8769.patch
>
>
> Aggregator checkpoint logic should take into account the checkPointDelay. 
> When the checkpoint is saved it is done with a currentTime minus the 
> checkPointDelay (this is a configurable value), when it is compared the next 
> iteration the checkPointDelay is not taken into account.
> In effect when the delay is the same or greater than interval, aggregator 
> will not work. 
> Example configuration that should work, and currently is broken (can be 
> edited using Ambari on metrics collector service page):
> {noformat}
> timeline.metrics.cluster.aggregator.minute.checkpointCutOffMultiplier = 2
> timeline.metrics.cluster.aggregator.minute.interval = 120
> {noformat}
> Solution:
> Fix the logic that checks if checkpoint is too old 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to