----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/31177/#review73133 -----------------------------------------------------------
ambari-server/src/main/resources/common-services/HIVE/0.12.0.2.0/package/alerts/alert_webhcat_server.py <https://reviews.apache.org/r/31177/#comment119362> Service isn't called Templeton anymore (property names aside). OK_MESSAGE should say WebHCat. ambari-server/src/main/resources/common-services/HIVE/0.12.0.2.0/package/alerts/alert_webhcat_server.py <https://reviews.apache.org/r/31177/#comment119364> We've repeated this pattern so much. Time for an r_m function? Curl(host, [kinit], [keytab], [principal] [timeout] , etc) ? - Nate Cole On Feb. 18, 2015, 9:43 p.m., Jonathan Hurley wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/31177/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated Feb. 18, 2015, 9:43 p.m.) > > > Review request for Ambari, Nate Cole and Tom Beerbower. > > > Bugs: AMBARI-9697 > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMBARI-9697 > > > Repository: ambari > > > Description > ------- > > After enabling Kerberos, the WebHCat Server Status alert is always CRITICAL. > This is caused by two problems: > > 1) The lack of any kinit and curl combination when the cluster is kerberized > 2) Assuming that cluster-env/security_enabled means SSL (which is does not!) > > Consulted with the Kerberos folks that cluster-env/security_enabled is used > to indicate kerberization. > > It appears that WebHCat doesn't have an SSL mode; So going back to the 1.7.0 > alert with a hard-coded http:// scheme for now. > > > Diffs > ----- > > > ambari-server/src/main/resources/common-services/HIVE/0.12.0.2.0/package/alerts/alert_webhcat_server.py > 44840de > > ambari-server/src/main/resources/stacks/BIGTOP/0.8/services/WEBHCAT/package/files/alert_webhcat_server.py > 44840de > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/31177/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > Tested in a kerberized cluster to ensure that the changed code fixed the > CRITICAL alert. Took the service down to verify that the alert triggered > correctly. > > Tested the alert in a regular cluster to ensure the non-kerberized path > worked as it has in the past. > > > Thanks, > > Jonathan Hurley > >
