[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMBARI-9733?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Robert Nettleton updated AMBARI-9733:
-------------------------------------
    Attachment:     (was: AMBARI-9733.patch)

> Exported HDFS HA Blueprint not deploying when used for new cluster
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: AMBARI-9733
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMBARI-9733
>             Project: Ambari
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: ambari-server
>    Affects Versions: 2.0.0
>            Reporter: Robert Nettleton
>            Assignee: Robert Nettleton
>             Fix For: 2.0.0
>
>   Original Estimate: 24h
>  Remaining Estimate: 24h
>
> Blueprints exported from HDFS HA clusters are not properly working when an 
> attempt is made to create a new cluster based on this exported Blueprint. 
> Steps to reproduce:
> 1. Use the Ambari UI to create a 3-node cluster with HDFS enabled
> 2. Use the Ambari UI HA Wizard to enable HDFS NameNode HA
> 3. Export a Blueprint from the running cluster using the REST API
> 4. Attempt to use this Blueprint to create a new, separate cluster
> There are two possible failures that this bug documents: 
> 1. The cluster startup attempt will fail with a "400" status error, and the 
> associated error message will mention that no instances of 
> "SECONDARY_NAMESERVER" are found for topology mapping.  This is an error in 
> the Blueprint processor, since the "SECONDARY_NAMESERVER" cannot be present 
> in an HDFS HA scenario. 
> 2. The cluster startup attempt will fail with a "400" status error, and the 
> associated error message will mention that either no instances of 
> "NAMESERVER" are found for topology mapping, or more than one instance has 
> been found.  This is actually an error in the handling of an "hbase-site" 
> property, "hbase.rootdir", that can refer to an HDFS HA nameservice address 
> in HA mode, rather than refer to an individual NameServer.  
> The Blueprint Configuration processor needs to be updated to handle these 
> HA-specific cases properly.
> In a future release, it may make sense to refactor the stack definitions to 
> include information about properties that have different meanings/values in 
> an HA scenario.  For this release (Ambari 2.0), the fixes should be made in 
> the Blueprint configuration processor. 
> I'm working on a patch for this now, and will be submitting shortly.  



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to