[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMBARI-8994?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14340534#comment-14340534
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on AMBARI-8994:
-----------------------------------

{color:green}+1 overall{color}.  Here are the results of testing the latest 
attachment 
  http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12701121/AMBARI-8994.1.patch
  against trunk revision .

    {color:green}+1 @author{color}.  The patch does not contain any @author 
tags.

    {color:green}+1 tests included{color}.  The patch appears to include 3 new 
or modified test files.

    {color:green}+1 javac{color}.  The applied patch does not increase the 
total number of javac compiler warnings.

    {color:green}+1 release audit{color}.  The applied patch does not increase 
the total number of release audit warnings.

    {color:green}+1 core tests{color}.  The patch passed unit tests in 
ambari-server.

Test results: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/Ambari-trunk-test-patch/1843//testReport/
Console output: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/Ambari-trunk-test-patch/1843//console

This message is automatically generated.

> AMS : Yarn service - RPC metrics returns duplicate array elements.
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: AMBARI-8994
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMBARI-8994
>             Project: Ambari
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: ambari-metrics
>    Affects Versions: 2.0.0
>            Reporter: Siddharth Wagle
>            Assignee: Florian Barca
>             Fix For: 2.0.0
>
>         Attachments: AMBARI-8994.1.patch
>
>
> API call:
> {code}
> http://localhost:8080/api/v1/clusters/cl1/hosts/ambari-api-tests-20-4.cs1cloud.internal/host_components/RESOURCEMANAGER?fields=metrics/rpc/RpcQueueTime_avg_time[1419970008,1419973608,15]
> {code}
> - Every 8th timestamp is duplicated.
> - AMS should be able to handle this.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to