-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/36943/#review93719
-----------------------------------------------------------



ambari-server/src/main/resources/common-services/HDFS/2.1.0.2.0/package/scripts/nfsgateway.py
 (lines 48 - 50)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/36943/#comment148123>

    If this is true, then the upgrade pack for 2.2.x -> 2.2.y needs to be 
updated.  If not, then this version check should be for 2.3.



ambari-server/src/main/resources/stacks/HDP/2.3/upgrades/upgrade-2.3.xml (line 
140)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/36943/#comment148124>

    +1 for this comment.  Also, python says 2.2 and higher, so would need 
HDP-2.2 -> 2.2 upgrade pack change.


- Nate Cole


On July 30, 2015, 11:33 a.m., Dmitro Lisnichenko wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/36943/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated July 30, 2015, 11:33 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Ambari, Alejandro Fernandez, Jonathan Hurley, and Nate 
> Cole.
> 
> 
> Bugs: AMBARI-12594
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMBARI-12594
> 
> 
> Repository: ambari
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> RU- 2.3 - 2.3 + - NFS jars are not upgraded and refer to old version after 
> the upgrade
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   
> ambari-server/src/main/resources/common-services/HDFS/2.1.0.2.0/package/scripts/nfsgateway.py
>  d599b8c 
>   ambari-server/src/main/resources/stacks/HDP/2.3/upgrades/upgrade-2.3.xml 
> 3dda481 
>   ambari-server/src/test/python/stacks/2.0.6/HDFS/test_nfsgateway.py 37dcb20 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/36943/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> OK
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Total run:808
> Total errors:0
> Total failures:0
> OK
> 
> Performing tests on live cluster
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Dmitro Lisnichenko
> 
>

Reply via email to