[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMBARI-12657?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14659800#comment-14659800
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on AMBARI-12657:
------------------------------------

{color:red}-1 overall{color}.  Here are the results of testing the latest 
attachment 
  http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12748995/AMBARI-12657.patch
  against trunk revision .

    {color:green}+1 @author{color}.  The patch does not contain any @author 
tags.

    {color:red}-1 tests included{color}.  The patch doesn't appear to include 
any new or modified tests.
                        Please justify why no new tests are needed for this 
patch.
                        Also please list what manual steps were performed to 
verify this patch.

    {color:green}+1 javac{color}.  The applied patch does not increase the 
total number of javac compiler warnings.

    {color:green}+1 release audit{color}.  The applied patch does not increase 
the total number of release audit warnings.

    {color:green}+1 core tests{color}.  The patch passed unit tests in 
ambari-server.

Test results: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/Ambari-trunk-test-patch/3539//testReport/
Console output: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/Ambari-trunk-test-patch/3539//console

This message is automatically generated.

> Cluster creates fail on larger deployments with SQL Azure DB
> ------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: AMBARI-12657
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMBARI-12657
>             Project: Ambari
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: ambari-server
>    Affects Versions: 2.0.0
>            Reporter: Jonathan Hurley
>            Assignee: Jonathan Hurley
>            Priority: Critical
>             Fix For: 2.1.1
>
>         Attachments: AMBARI-12657.patch
>
>
> We started doing larger cluster creates (48 workernodes) with SQL Azure DB as 
> an Ambari DB, and we are seeing below HTTP GET requests timeout on the client 
> side (even after retries), resulting in cluster create failures (15%). This 
> is a tracking Jira to resolve the CRUD failures.
> What I’m seeing is that DB CPU usage goes above 50% in some of my experiments 
> for 48 node clusters. This might explain why SQL is running slow.
> end_time            avg_cpu_percent            avg_data_io_percent    
> avg_log_write_percent                avg_memory_usage_percent
> 2015-08-05 18:51:24.153                40.89     0.00        0.62        0.67
> 2015-08-05 18:51:09.107                41.86     0.00        1.49        0.67
> 2015-08-05 18:50:54.090                24.36     0.00        0.08        0.67
> 2015-08-05 18:50:38.763                43.16     0.00        0.57        0.67
> 2015-08-05 18:50:23.700                65.03     0.00        0.51        0.67
> 2015-08-05 18:50:07.840                28.57     0.00        0.45        0.67
> 2015-08-05 18:49:49.480                39.78     0.00        0.42        0.67
> 2015-08-05 18:49:34.383                28.14     0.00        0.43        0.67
> Most expensive queries in terms of CPU time are below. 
> Basically, it’s this one query which consumes most of the CPU. Query plan is 
> also attached.
> {code}
> SELECT DISTINCT t0.request_id FROM host_role_command t0 WHERE NOT EXISTS 
> (SELECT @P0 FROM host_role_command t1 WHERE (t1.status IN 
> (@P1,@P2,@P3,@P4,@P5,@P6,@P7,@P8,@P9)))  ORDER BY t0.request_id ASC
> {code}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to