-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/41115/#review109606
-----------------------------------------------------------

Ship it!


Ship It!

- Jonathan Hurley


On Dec. 9, 2015, 4:34 p.m., Alejandro Fernandez wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/41115/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Dec. 9, 2015, 4:34 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Ambari, Dmytro Grinenko, Dmitro Lisnichenko, Jonathan 
> Hurley, Nate Cole, and Swapan Shridhar.
> 
> 
> Bugs: AMBARI-14281
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMBARI-14281
> 
> 
> Repository: ambari
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> If a cluster has version x (e.g., HDP 2.3.2.0-2950) as CURRENT, and the user 
> registers a Repository Version such as 2.3.xx that uses different build URLs 
> but results in the same build number, then installing packages will be a 
> no-op.
> This means that no new version will be detected using the "deltas" method and 
> the repo_version entity will keep the "version" field without a build number, 
> and the Cluster Version entity will transition into INSTALLED (since 
> technically it is already installed).
> 
> This incorrect setup will allow the user to start a RU/EU, which will 
> immediately fail since the Repo Version has no build number, which is needed 
> by hdp-select.
> 
> The fix is to add a PreCheck that ensures that all repos contain a build 
> number.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   
> ambari-server/src/main/java/org/apache/ambari/server/checks/InstallPackagesCheck.java
>  15b6140 
>   
> ambari-server/src/test/java/org/apache/ambari/server/checks/InstallPackagesCheckTest.java
>  56aa1f3 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/41115/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> mvn clean test
> Tested that a build must contain a build number before starting RU/EU.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Alejandro Fernandez
> 
>

Reply via email to