[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMBARI-14564?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15092291#comment-15092291
 ] 

Hudson commented on AMBARI-14564:
---------------------------------

SUCCESS: Integrated in Ambari-branch-2.2 #173 (See 
[https://builds.apache.org/job/Ambari-branch-2.2/173/])
AMBARI-14564. Removed -Ignore from test cases, removed -Noncacheable (smohanty: 
[http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=ambari.git&a=commit&h=0ac47ee2efa94593db9464b3aca30ada69d36579])
* 
ambari-server/src/test/java/org/apache/ambari/server/orm/dao/AlertDispatchDAOTest.java
* 
ambari-server/src/main/java/org/apache/ambari/server/orm/entities/AlertTargetEntity.java
* 
ambari-server/src/test/java/org/apache/ambari/server/orm/dao/AlertDefinitionDAOTest.java
* 
ambari-server/src/test/java/org/apache/ambari/server/orm/dao/RequestDAOTest.java


> Fix unit test failures 
> -----------------------
>
>                 Key: AMBARI-14564
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMBARI-14564
>             Project: Ambari
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: alerts, ambari-server
>    Affects Versions: 2.2.0
>            Reporter: Laszlo Puskas
>            Assignee: Laszlo Puskas
>             Fix For: 2.2.1
>
>         Attachments: AMBARI-14564.v1.patch
>
>   Original Estimate: 48h
>  Remaining Estimate: 48h
>
> Some unit tests started to fail after a previously introduced change.
> Context:
> - subsequently changing alert targets (changing alert groups attached to 
> alert targets) resulted in ConcurrentModificationException
> - changing the code that updates alert groups fixed the CME, however another 
> issue arose: after subsequently changing alert targets, at a given point 
> changes were not reflected after save
> - excluding the relationship between alert targets and alert groups from 
> caching solved the problem
> This solution apparently caused a regression in the cluster deletion process.
> This issue is about removing @Ignore annotations and providing a good 
> implementation for the causing issue. 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to