-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/43090/#review117406
-----------------------------------------------------------


Ship it!




Ship It!

- Dmitro Lisnichenko


On Feb. 2, 2016, 4:06 p.m., Andrew Onischuk wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/43090/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Feb. 2, 2016, 4:06 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Ambari and Dmitro Lisnichenko.
> 
> 
> Bugs: AMBARI-14876
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMBARI-14876
> 
> 
> Repository: ambari
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Agents seems to be creating 1000's of status command files when there should
> only be 1. Doing an `ls` on the following directory takes 10 seconds. Here's a
> snippet:
> 
>     
>     
>     
>     [root@c6402 ~]# ll /var/lib/ambari-agent/data/
>     ...
>     -rw-r--r-- 1 root root        0 Jan 31 13:50 
> status_command_stdout.txt.99404
>     -rw-r--r-- 1 root root        0 Jan 31 13:50 
> status_command_stdout.txt.99405
>     -rw-r--r-- 1 root root        0 Jan 31 13:50 
> status_command_stdout.txt.99406
>     -rw-r--r-- 1 root root        0 Jan 31 13:50 
> status_command_stdout.txt.99407
>     -rw-r--r-- 1 root root        0 Jan 31 13:50 
> status_command_stdout.txt.99408
>     -rw-r--r-- 1 root root        0 Jan 31 13:50 
> status_command_stdout.txt.99409
>     ...
>     [root@c6402 ~]# find /var/lib/ambari-agent/data -name "status_command*" | 
> wc -l
>     230582
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   ambari-agent/src/main/python/ambari_agent/CustomServiceOrchestrator.py 
> 6c1a161 
>   ambari-agent/src/main/python/ambari_agent/PythonExecutor.py 352974f 
>   ambari-agent/src/main/python/ambari_agent/PythonReflectiveExecutor.py 
> 4a7ed1c 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/43090/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> mvn clean test
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Andrew Onischuk
> 
>

Reply via email to