[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMBARI-14852?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15147714#comment-15147714
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on AMBARI-14852:
------------------------------------

{color:red}-1 overall{color}.  Here are the results of testing the latest 
attachment 
  http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12787937/AMBARI-14852.patch
  against trunk revision .

    {color:green}+1 @author{color}.  The patch does not contain any @author 
tags.

    {color:red}-1 tests included{color}.  The patch doesn't appear to include 
any new or modified tests.
                        Please justify why no new tests are needed for this 
patch.
                        Also please list what manual steps were performed to 
verify this patch.

    {color:green}+1 javac{color}.  The applied patch does not increase the 
total number of javac compiler warnings.

    {color:green}+1 release audit{color}.  The applied patch does not increase 
the total number of release audit warnings.

    {color:green}+1 core tests{color}.  The patch passed unit tests in 
contrib/views/capacity-scheduler.

Test results: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/Ambari-trunk-test-patch/5378//testReport/
Console output: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/Ambari-trunk-test-patch/5378//console

This message is automatically generated.

> Capacity Scheduler View - Provide dropdown for scheduling calculator
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: AMBARI-14852
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMBARI-14852
>             Project: Ambari
>          Issue Type: Task
>            Reporter: Akhil PB
>         Attachments: AMBARI-14852.patch
>
>
> *Cluster wide scheduling - Calculator*
> Provide dropdown for Scheduling calculator, with two options today:
> * Use Memory as resource in calculation
> * DRF for using all resources - memory, CPU, disk, network - in calculation



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to