> On Feb. 18, 2016, 7:57 p.m., bhuvnesh chaudhary wrote:
> > ambari-server/src/main/resources/common-services/HAWQ/2.0.0/alerts.json, 
> > line 7
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/43753/diff/1/?file=1258950#file1258950line7>
> >
> >     We might need to still rephrase it and may be what we had earlier was 
> > okay, as there are situation where the status will be mentioned as Not 
> > Synchronized but resynchronize will not fix it. Re-sync will not work on 
> > all the situations.
> >     
> >     Once has to remove the standby and re-init it. 
> >     
> >     Refer to the greenplum article, HAWQ should be behaving the same. 
> >     
> > https://support.pivotal.io/hc/en-us/articles/201157218-gpstate-f-reports-Standby-master-too-far-behind-
> 
> Matt wrote:
>     So what are you suggesting?
>     - Leave the message as it is, and let the user figure it out somehow? Not 
> a good idea to leave the user in the dark.
>     - Add an additional line saying: "If HAWQ Standby is too far behind HAWQ 
> Master, HAWQ Standby might have to be deleted and installed again"?
> 
> Goutam Tadi wrote:
>     Suggestion to addendum: "Try resynchronizing Standby (Re-Synchronize HAWQ 
> Standby). If this doesn't work  reinstall Standby."
> 
> bhuvnesh chaudhary wrote:
>     It is a description of the alert, so can be informative. So will suggest 
> to have additional information.
>     However, before adding that line, lets syncup in Apache HAWQ forum to 
> confirm the behavior and then update here.
> 
> Matt wrote:
>     How about this?
>     
>     "This alert will trigger if HAWQ Standby is not synchronized with HAWQ 
> Master. To synchronize HAWQ Standby with HAWQ Master, use the service action 
> 'Re-Synchronize HAWQ Standby' on HAWQ service page. If HAWQ Standby is too 
> far behind HAWQ Master, HAWQ Standby would have to be deleted and installed 
> again."
> 
> Newton Alex wrote:
>     I think ""This alert will trigger if HAWQ Standby is not synchronized 
> with HAWQ Master. To synchronize HAWQ Standby with HAWQ Master, use the 
> service action 'Re-Synchronize HAWQ Standby' on HAWQ service page." is good 
> enough.
>     The other sentence "If HAWQ Standby is too far behind HAWQ Master, HAWQ 
> Standby would have to be deleted and installed again." can be part of the 
> Resync action itself. It need not be part of this alert.

Newton, that is a great idea.
Considering that Re-Sync is a custom action, where do you think we should show 
this message? On the stdout of Ambari console? Would have been great if it we 
had a pop-up after the action, like a reminder.


- Matt


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/43753/#review119802
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Feb. 18, 2016, 7:33 p.m., Matt wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/43753/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Feb. 18, 2016, 7:33 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Ambari, Alexander Denissov, bhuvnesh chaudhary, Goutam 
> Tadi, jun aoki, Lav Jain, and Newton Alex.
> 
> 
> Bugs: AMBARI-15104
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMBARI-15104
> 
> 
> Repository: ambari
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Update the description for the alert so that the user knows what to do if the 
> alert is triggered from the description on the alert page
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   ambari-server/src/main/resources/common-services/HAWQ/2.0.0/alerts.json 
> 3119a0c 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/43753/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Manually Tested. Descriptions appears on the alerts page.
> 
> No additional unit tests required.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Matt
> 
>

Reply via email to