+1 for Apache Ambari 2.5 RC2 Contents look good. The only difference versus my build using the tag is that some of the images are gzipped.
Thank you, Alejandro Fernandez Apache Ambari PMC On 3/28/17, 9:57 AM, "Yusaku Sako" <[email protected]> wrote: >+1 for RC2. >Verified checksums, signature, verified that .git artifacts no longer >exist. > >Yusaku > > > > >On 3/28/17, 9:47 AM, "Jonathan Hurley" <[email protected]> wrote: > >>+1 for RC2 - verified source compared to Git as well as checksums. >> >>On Mar 28, 2017, at 11:18 AM, Roman Shaposhnik >><[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >>On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 5:57 PM, Aravindan Vijayan >><[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>Thanks for letting me know Yusaku. >> >>I have created another apache-ambari-2.5.0 release candidate (RC2). >> >>GIT source tag (release-2.5.0-rc2) >>https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/ambari/repo?p=ambari.git;a=log;h= >>r >>efs/tags/release-2.5.0-rc2 >> >>Staging site: http://home.apache.org/~avijayan/apache-ambari-2.5.0-rc2/ >> >>PGP release keys (signed using 088372a9) - >>http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?search=0x088372A9&op=vindex >> >>One can look into the issues fixed in this release at >>https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMBARI/fixforversion/12336060/?sele >>c >>tedTab=com.atlassian.jira.jira-projects-plugin:version-summary-panel >> >>Vote will be open for 24 hours. (Since there is no code change since >>last RC) >>[ ] +1 approve >>[ ] +0 no opinion >>[ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) >> >>My vote: +1 >> >>+1 (non-binding) >> >>tested with Bigtop 1.2 and ODPi. >> >>Thanks, >>Roman. >>
