Sorry, I have one question. Assuming that we support HDP in the 2.7.x line, can we still download and deploy its packages from a public repository? I think Cloudera's repositories went behind a paywall, but maybe I don't understand its usage or terms of use so much.
Kengo Seki <[email protected]> On Mon, Jun 20, 2022 at 10:30 AM Kengo Seki <[email protected]> wrote: > > Zhiguo's opinion sounds reasonable to me. Let me clarify a few things > (correct me if there's any misunderstanding, Zhiguo): > > > Bigtop mpack will not immediate goal for us at least for 2.7.7, as there > > will be lot work needs to done > > Bigtop Mpack is developed by the Bigtop community, and Yuqi is > actively working on it in BIGTOP-3689. > So we just help it (for example, giving them some advice if asked) on > the Ambari side and our main focus is still the next Ambari release. > (That being said, the current Mpack only supports ZK and Hadoop, so if > someone is willing to add other components to it, it will be really > welcomed!) > > > And when the time comes for 2.8.0 (or 3.0.0), we can discuss more about > > moving towards "bigtop mpack" based support only. > > I don't think that's what Zhiguo meant. On the contrary, he meant: > > * For Ambari 2.7.5 (and maybe 2.7.6), we can provide the Bigtop stack > only through Mpack, so we use it. > * Since Ambari 2.8.0 (or 2.7.7?), we replace the default stack with > Bigtop's one as built-in, which allows us to drop the Bigtop Mpack. > > Kengo Seki <[email protected]> > > On Mon, Jun 20, 2022 at 8:33 AM Viraj Jasani <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > FWIW, I agree with Brahma, we should focus on releasing 2.7.7 to get the > > dev/test efforts rolling first before we shift our attention to "bigdop > > only" releases for Ambari. And when the time comes for 2.8.0 (or 3.0.0), we > > can discuss more about moving towards "bigtop mpack" based support only. > > > > On Sun, Jun 19, 2022 at 9:21 AM Battula, Brahma Reddy > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > IMO, Bigtop mpack will not immediate goal for us at least for 2.7.7, as > > > there will be lot work needs to done to support latest stack and existing > > > the cluster upgrades. > > > > > > I am preparing draft road map. Let's see how that can be. > > > > > > > > > On 19/06/22, 9:42 PM, "吴治国" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > Hey guys, > > > > > > There are some difficulties for users to use Ambari since HDP is > > > behind the paywall, I think this is the first problem we have to solve. > > > Because the Bigtop stack is fully tested, and it's also belongs to > > > ASF, I think it's an ideal choice. > > > > > > Since Ambari 2.7.5 and 2.7.6 have been released, there are limited > > > things we can do, so I consider: > > > 1、We should help Bigtop community to provide bgtp-ambari-mpack to > > > support Ambari 2.7.5 and 2.7.6. > > > 2、Start the development of Ambari 2.8.0, in this version, I prefer to > > > drop HDP completely and use Bigtop as default. > > > > > > Normally, from Bigtop side, a Bigtop version only supports one Ambari > > > version, and current bgtp-ambari-mpack is for Ambari 2.7.5, so I think we > > > can first consider the combination of Bigtop 3.1.0 + Ambari 2.7.5. > > > Users can download Ambari 2.7.5 from the Bigtop release site by > > > setting the OS repository, and install bgtp-ambari-mpack manually. > > > > > > Regarding Ambari 2.7.6, we can consider it later. > > > Regarding Ambari 2.8.0, I'm more inclined to support Bigtop 3.1.0 > > > first. > > > What do you think? > > > > > > Best Regards, > > > Zhiguo Wu > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
