Sure Zhiguo, makes sense. I think both of your above suggestions are good enough.
On Thu, Aug 25, 2022 at 7:21 PM 吴治国 <[email protected]> wrote: > > > if we cut off branch 2.8 from 2.7 for minor release related improvements > > I have the same idea before, but since 3.0.0 will not be released in the > near future, and we have not decided on the roadmap of 3.0.0, I think the > trunk branch is more appropriate for 2.8.0 right now. > > >>> Shall we remove from the branch-2.7 also.? > > BTW, I think we should keep as few changes as possible in branch-2.7. > > Best Regards, > Zhiguo Wu > > > On Aug 26, 2022, at 08:26, Viraj Jasani <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Also, we might also want to consider removing ambari-metrics with 2.8.0 > (or > > 3.0.0 if we go from 2.7 to 3.0) onwards. While trunk already has it > > removed, if we cut off branch 2.8 from 2.7 for minor release related > > improvements, perhaps we no longer need to keep ambari-metrics with > ambari > > repo. We can focus on releasing ambari-metrics separately. Thoughts? > > > > > > On Thu, Aug 25, 2022 at 12:48 PM Viraj Jasani <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > >> +1 (non-binding) for removal of ambari-infra and ambari-logsearch from > >> branch-2.7. > >> > >> > >> On Wed, Aug 24, 2022 at 8:54 AM Battula, Brahma Reddy > >> <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >>> Hi All, > >>> > >>> > >>> Ambari-infra and Ambari-logsearch are removed from the trunk and they > are > >>> maintained as subprojects. > >>> > >>> Shall we remove from the branch-2.7 also.? > >>> > >>> I am thinking we can keep metrics as of now, as Metrics will be > deployed > >>> together with ambari (Most of the cases). > >>> > >>> > >>> Any thoughts on this..? > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> Regards > >>> Brahma Reddy Battula > >>> > >> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >
