+1 for JDK-17 support in ambari.

-Arshad

On Fri, Apr 12, 2024 at 10:58 AM Sharma, Vivek <vivsh...@visa.com.invalid>
wrote:

> +1 for JDK-17 support in Ambari to keep up with the ecosystem projects and
> benefit from newer Java features
>
> Thanks,
> Vivek
>
> From: vishal suvagia <vishalsuva...@yahoo.com.INVALID>
> Date: Thursday, 11 April 2024 at 10:26 PM
> To: dev@ambari.apache.org <dev@ambari.apache.org>
> Subject: Re: [Discuss] JDK17 Support for Ambari
> +1 for JDK-17 support.I agree with Viraj, we can start with run time and
> gradually build on the same as required.
>
> Thanks
> Vishal.
>
>
>
>    On Saturday, 10 February, 2024 at 11:34:09 pm IST, Viraj Jasani <
> vjas...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>  +1 for JDK17 support. I believe we can start testing with runtime support
> first.
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 6, 2024 at 11:27 PM Battula, Brahma Reddy
> <bbatt...@visa.com.invalid> wrote:
>
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I noticed that some Apache projects have already started working on or
> > supporting JDK17[1][2][3][4].
> >
> > Migrating from Java 8 to Java 17 brings many benefits such as performance
> > enhancements, language improvements, security updates, and better tool
> > support. It also allows us to take advantage of newer Java features.
> >
> > I think it’s time for us to start planning to migrate from JDK8 to JDK17.
> > What are your thoughts on this?
> >
> >
> > Regards
> > Brahma
> >
> >
> >  1.
> https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fissues.apache.org%2Fjira%2Fbrowse%2FHIVE-26473&data=05%7C02%7Cvivsharm%40visa.com%7C68819d757a564810ab9708dc5a486375%7C38305e12e15d4ee888b9c4db1c477d76%7C0%7C0%7C638484514156296603%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=nrtQ%2FkI%2FONX1yAb1%2BCZjMwrac35jLG4ur8rdIQX%2BAKo%3D&reserved=0
> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-26473>
> >  2.
> https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fissues.apache.org%2Fjira%2Fbrowse%2FHADOOP-17177&data=05%7C02%7Cvivsharm%40visa.com%7C68819d757a564810ab9708dc5a486375%7C38305e12e15d4ee888b9c4db1c477d76%7C0%7C0%7C638484514156306981%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=rhskBVuKl5gl9aQV5ClXE%2BNzpgIP%2FD%2FoBQguvM9Sty8%3D&reserved=0
> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-17177>
> >  3.
> https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fissues.apache.org%2Fjira%2Fbrowse%2FSPARK-33772&data=05%7C02%7Cvivsharm%40visa.com%7C68819d757a564810ab9708dc5a486375%7C38305e12e15d4ee888b9c4db1c477d76%7C0%7C0%7C638484514156311453%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=ohk9RywDaOeneCdFEBoySESBxBpPXmaut%2BzicTyFyrE%3D&reserved=0
> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-33772>
> >  4.
> https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fissues.apache.org%2Fjira%2Fbrowse%2FBEAM-12240&data=05%7C02%7Cvivsharm%40visa.com%7C68819d757a564810ab9708dc5a486375%7C38305e12e15d4ee888b9c4db1c477d76%7C0%7C0%7C638484514156316607%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=xsAoyzP0TO6wYtlCZyUXQU%2FFUSIGtS4DIF7d%2B73xRpw%3D&reserved=0
> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-12240>
> >
>
>

Reply via email to