https://ambari.staged.apache.org/docs/quick-start/installation-guide <https://ambari.staged.apache.org/docs/quick-start/installation-guide> The new website has been remade and will be launched alongside version 3.0. It is mostly built using Markdown (MD). Can it replace the wiki?
> On Mar 18, 2025, at 07:49, Wei-Chiu Chuang <weic...@apache.org> wrote: > > I don't think we're using GitHub Discussion yet. But also, should we > consider enabling GitHub wiki too? > > On Mon, Mar 17, 2025 at 4:40 PM Viraj Jasani <vjas...@apache.org> wrote: > >> ---------- Forwarded message --------- >> From: Daniel Gruno <humbed...@apache.org> >> Date: Mon, Mar 17, 2025 at 10:38 AM >> Subject: [ASF] A note to projects with GitHub Discussions in use >> To: <annou...@infra.apache.org> >> >> >> Projects that are using GitHub Discussions and have suddenly found that >> feature to be missing, please see >> >> https://github.com/apache/infrastructure-asfyaml?tab=readme-ov-file#repo_features >> >> GitHub Discussions are now managed entirely through .asf.yaml, and will >> default to being disabled unless enabled in your .asf.yaml file, OR if >> you do not have a valid 'discussions' entry in your notifications >> section in the configuration. >> >> >> The TL;DR for enabling Discussions in .asf.yaml is to weave these >> settings into your .asf.yaml file in your default branch: >> >> >> notifications: >> discussions: iss...@foo.apache.org (use your own mailing list here) >> ... >> github: >> features: >> discussions: true >>
