Hi,

Thanks for driving the release!

-1 (binding)
I found a fatal bug[1] that also exists in this release candidate.
I suggest we fix this bug before proceeding with the release.

[1] https://github.com/apache/amoro/issues/4223

Best,
Jinsong

On Mon, May 18, 2026 at 1:44 PM Xavier Bai <[email protected]> wrote:

> Thanks for driving the release. I did some local verification and
> everything looks good overall.
>
> One minor issue is that the Helm chart version was not updated, but it does
> not affect functionality, so I’m still giving this a +1.
>
> Checked the following:
> [✓] Download links are valid
> [✓] Checksums and signatures
> [✓] LICENSE/NOTICE files exist
> [✓] No unexpected binary files
> [✓] Deploy in our local dev env
> [✓] Can compile from source
>
> ConradJam <[email protected]> 于2026年5月17日周日 20:21写道:
>
> > Hello, Amoro devs,
> > Now, Kindly request the developers to review and vote on releasing Amoro
> > 0.9.0-incubating RC2. Apache Amoro(incubating) is a Lakehouse management
> > system built on open data lake formats. The official Apache source
> release
> > to be deployed to dist.apache.org:
> >
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/amoro/0.9.0-incubating-RC2/
> > This source release has been signed with a PGP available here (Apache ID:
> > taowang): https://downloads.apache.org/incubator/amoro/KEYS All
> artifacts
> > to be deployed to the Maven Central Repository:
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheamoro-1076
> Git
> > branch for the release: https://github.com/apache/amoro/tree/v0.9.0-rc2
> > Please download, verify, and test. The VOTE will pass after 3 binding
> > approvals. [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove with the
> > reason To learn more about Apache Amoro, please see
> > https://amoro.apache.org
> > Checklist for reference: [ ] Download links are valid. [ ] Checksums and
> > signatures. [ ] LICENSE/NOTICE files exist. [ ] No unexpected binary
> files
> > [ ] All source files have ASF headers. [ ] Can compile from source
> >
> >
> > --
> > Best
> >
> > ConradJam
> >
>

Reply via email to