Hello Amoro community,

I would like to open a PPMC vote on Apache Amoro (incubating)
0.9.0-incubating RC12, the twelfth release candidate of the 0.9.0 cycle.

Context since the last round:

- RC10 passed the community vote [1][2], but the follow-up IPMC vote [3]
  received a binding -1: the source archive carried 3,119 macOS
  AppleDouble (._*) entries and failed to build on Linux, and the
  LICENSE files had several attribution gaps. The vote was cancelled
  and both findings were fixed: #4390 / #4387 (the source-release
  script now prevents and rejects AppleDouble pollution) and
  #4389 / #4382 / #4388 (LICENSE and LICENSE-binary completed,
  including the ICU attribution, the Jersey EPL 2.0 entries, and the
  previously missing CDDL dependencies).
- RC11 was cut from the updated 0.9.x branch but retired during
  pre-vote verification after two further issues were found: the
  mixed-format Flink 1.20 modules still referenced a wrong parent
  version (breaking the staging deploy), and the bundled icu4j lacked
  attribution in LICENSE-binary. RC12 carries exactly these two fixes
  plus the version bump:
  https://github.com/apache/amoro/compare/v0.9.0-rc11...v0.9.0-rc12

The candidate:

- Release artifacts (source and binary tarballs, with signatures and
  SHA-512 checksums):

https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/amoro/0.9.0-incubating-RC12/
- Release signing keys:
  https://downloads.apache.org/incubator/amoro/KEYS
- Maven staging repository:
  https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheamoro-1090
- Git tag:
  https://github.com/apache/amoro/tree/v0.9.0-rc12
- Website: https://amoro.apache.org/

The release artifacts are signed with my key
4521657F6642F8DF23FD262E84027FCC19B0D30B (czy006 <[email protected]>),
available in the KEYS file above.

The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It passes with a minimum
of 3 binding +1 votes from Amoro PPMC members and no binding -1.

[ ] +1 Approve
[ ] +0 No opinion
[ ] -1 Disapprove (because ...)

Checklist for reference:

[ ] Download links are valid
[ ] Checksums and signatures verify against KEYS
[ ] LICENSE, NOTICE, and DISCLAIMER are correct
[ ] No unexpected binary files in the source release
[ ] All source files have ASF headers
[ ] Can compile from source

Thanks,
czy006 (Conrad Jam)

[1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/fc8qryy5rwsrqqglhrzogmctkrjz4v2n
[2] https://lists.apache.org/thread/c0zlx8dlxn3yhvdxcjly7t6mopbmxz26
[3] https://lists.apache.org/thread/xvbr5djyb6s3n2srg1472jfpn9lzljhx


-- 
Best

ConradJam

Reply via email to