Thanks John and Randall!

Apologies for not having more to report and somehow letting this sneak up on me 
(personally).


/me will calendar this thing... >_<


Thanks again,

Benjamin


--

http://bigbluehat.com/

http://linkedin.com/in/benjaminyoung

________________________________
From: John D. Ament <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, November 6, 2016 8:53:05 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Board Report

Based on your response, I've updated podlings.xml to add a month.

On 2016-11-06 00:45 (-0500), Randall Leeds <[email protected]> wrote:
> We're passed the date, and I'm not sure what to add, really, other than
> that we've got the stub web site (h/t niq).
>
> As best I can tell the way forward is probably just to look forward and
> start in on some projects so that we have progress we want to share next
> month :)
>
> https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/November2016
>
> On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 10:46 AM Randall Leeds <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> > Looks like I'll get to this later today, but not until 3p pacific or so.
> >
> > On Fri, Nov 4, 2016, 10:41 Benjamin Young <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > Thanks, Randall!
> >
> >
> > Let me know if you need help on this.
> >
> >
> > Additionally, I'm hoping to tackle some web site/promo stuff later
> > today/early-next-week.
> >
> >
> > Sorry for the delays...swamped here too. :-/
> >
> >
> > More soon!
> >
> > Benjamin
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > http://bigbluehat.com/
> >
> > http://linkedin.com/in/benjaminyoung
> >
> > ________________________________
> > From: Randall Leeds <[email protected]>
> > Sent: Thursday, November 3, 2016 3:23:33 PM
> > To: [email protected]; [email protected]
> > Subject: Re: Board Report
> >
> > I'll draft it later tonight if no one beats me to it.
> >
> > Thanks for the bump, I've had a busy week and this got buried.
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 2, 2016, 15:12 John D. Ament <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > Dear Annotator Podling,
> > >
> > > Just wondering if you were planning to put together a board report this
> > > month.
> > >
> > > John
> > >
> >
> >
>

Reply via email to