+1

:)

On Thu, 4 Jun, 2020, 18:53 Suzan Uskudarli, <suzan.uskuda...@gmail.com>
wrote:

>
> All checks succeed:
>
> 1. gpg --verify apache-annotator-*.tar.gz.asc  --  OK (good sigs from
> Randall Leeds)
> 2. sha256sum  and sha512sum --  OK
> apache-annotator-0.1.0-rc.4-incubating.tar.gz: OK
> 3. git remote show origin -- OK
> 4. git describe  -- OK   (v0.1.0-rc.4)
> 5. git fetch --unshallow origin tag v0.1.0-rc.4 -- OK
> 6. git status --ignored  -- OK (On branch v0.1.x, no changes added to
> commit )
> 7. make check: OK
> 8. License - OK
>
> I am attaching all the results in case it may be useful
>
> I don't know if I am eligible to vote, if I am +1
>
> On Wed, Jun 3, 2020 at 9:26 PM Benjamin Young <byo...@bigbluehat.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Just completed all the tests, and everything looks great!
>>
>> +1
>>
>> (sorry again for the delay!)
>> Benjamin
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> http://bigbluehat.com/
>>
>> http://linkedin.com/in/benjaminyoung
>>
>> ________________________________
>> From: Benjamin Young <byo...@bigbluehat.com>
>> Sent: Tuesday, June 2, 2020 5:06 PM
>> To: dev@annotator.incubator.apache.org <
>> dev@annotator.incubator.apache.org>
>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Annotator (incubating) version 0.1.0
>> (-rc.4)
>>
>> Started work on this today, but my day got eaten. 😕 I'll try again
>> tomorrow...
>>
>> Apologies,
>> Benjamin
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> http://bigbluehat.com/
>>
>> http://linkedin.com/in/benjaminyoung
>>
>> ________________________________
>> From: Gerben <ger...@treora.com.INVALID>
>> Sent: Tuesday, June 2, 2020 7:49 AM
>> To: dev@annotator.incubator.apache.org <
>> dev@annotator.incubator.apache.org>
>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Annotator (incubating) version 0.1.0
>> (-rc.4)
>>
>> +1 indeed.
>>
>> I ran all checks except Rat.
>>
>> On 31/05/2020 02:52, Randall Leeds wrote:
>> > My test results:
>> >
>> > - Signature OK
>> > - Checksums OK
>> > - Local tag matches remote tag
>> > - Contents of the tarball are clean
>> > - Running "make check" passes (Node.js v10.19.0)
>> > - Apache Rat shows no files with license issues
>> >
>> > Vote: +1
>> >
>>
>

Reply via email to