DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15550>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15550 Internal Javadoc? ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-11 16:35 ------- we kind of depend on exec() in so much of ant, that pre-macos X is not a realistic problem to address. In VM javadoc may be faster, and faster is better. Has anyone tested it to see if it leaks like a sieve the way javac has historically? It took a lot of time for sun to fix that, which required them to recognise that in-VM javac was actually a legitimate activity.
