----- Original Message ----- From: "Conor MacNeill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I'd like to throw this up again. What are peoples thoughts on the following > > 1. Make Ant 1.6.x the last JDK 1.1 release. This would be clearly documented I would say 1.5.x so long as x is not frozen. IOW, if there are critical bugs that mandate a release through the 1.5 branch to work in environments that do not have the ability to run JDK 1.2, then we should be open to that. Should we even consider -target=1.1 or does the newer .class format help in any way? > 2. Make the subsequent release require JDK 1.2+ (what about leap frogging to > later versions?) The most stable version of JDK 1.2 that the vendor provides. > 3. Name this subsequent release Ant 2.0 (due to its change in system > requirements) ok. > 4. Drop all the Ant2 cruft from the website. Is adding more cruft to mark the old cruft as obsolete an option? ;-) > Just as a data point, CVS HEAD (Ant 1.6) has not compiled against JDK 1.1 for > a while now (due to diagnostics changes). > > -- > Conor MacNeill > Blog: http://codefeed.com/blog/ > Cheers, Magesh ********************************************************** * Dictionary: A place where success comes before work. * **********************************************************
