On Wed, 19 Mar 2003 06:13 pm, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > > -0 and +1 on doing it after 1.6. I think this is a majority vote, > isn't it?
:-). I guess so, although I'd like to see consensus anyway. Your -0 isn't a veto, in any case. Do you have some reservations? Is it just a timing issue? > > +1 on making 1.5.4 (if needed) support JDK 1.1. And Ant 1.5.5 :-) -- Conor MacNeill Blog: http://codefeed.com/blog/
