Hi Stefan and all! > > To solve this topic I'd like to clearify here which of the listed > > elements should be listed in the defaults.properties > > Almost all of them are base classes that should not be listed or > utterly, totally deprected and removed task - the classes are still > there for people who may have used the API directly. > > I think there is nothing listed, that should be in the properties > files. The gory details:
So I am glad, that I can rely upon the the actuality of the defaults.properties! Thanx! I am currently working on a taskdef/typedef wizard (for ANTidote of course) and I want to provide "in-the-classpath-findable" Tasks/Types in a list. I'll simply filter out all found abstact classes... ... and probably all Types/Tasks in "our" packages, but probably others have reused our package-structure for their additional classes...!?! Thoughts? Improvements? Greetings, Christoph
