+1, with couple of questions -I'm unsure about the point that Active PMC members have the binding vote for committers -to date its been open to all committers to have binding votes. Is there a reason for the change?
-We dont have anything (formally) about the survey process used to cover Java1.1 to 1.2 migration. I dont think this is an issue; it was just a survey to see what the users would think of something we were to vote on, but I think it worked well. Maybe we should say that 'changes of a fundamental nature' may need to be bounced past the users as well as developers, as now we have two mail lists, the users arent always aware of what is going on. Of course if we formalise it, then you have to say 'what is so fundamental to merit a survey', which argues against mentioning the subject at all -steve ----- Original Message ----- From: "Conor MacNeill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Ant Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, May 20, 2003 00:00 Subject: [PMC VOTE] Adoption of Bylaws > PMC members, > > I'd like to move towards adoption of the bylaws draft. > http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/*checkout*/ant/proposal/ant-site/anakia/do cs/bylaws.html?rev=1.16 > > Could you please view this and vote indicating your position. If you wish to > vote -1 because you don't believe the bylaws include all they should, that's > OK, of course, but please give me details on what changes are required. > > Thanks > Conor > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
