DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15310>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15310 jar task very slow for large input lists ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-06-02 18:45 ------- It *may* be related, but note that if I simply don't specify a fileset (i.e. default includes of **), then the speed is comparable to that of the JDK jar command. If, however, I list each file explicitly in an includes file, the performance is abysmal. I'm still using the JDK's jar command via the exec task...