On Fri, 11 Jul 2003, Richard Evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In the case where all the patternset entries are names with no wild > cards, it seems that DirectoryScanner can be speeded up by using a > hash lookup.
Yes, sounds reasonable. I don't see why it shouldn't work. Note, that not only * but also ? is used as a wildcard by Ant, though. > Alternatively, is there a faster way of doing what I want? Using only a handfull of patterns instead of many, many fixed names? No real solution, I guess. Stefan --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]