On second though, instead of renaming, why don't we use IDs, which are
common and well understood:
<import file="a.xml" id="a" />
<import file="b.xml" id="b" />
<override-target target="init">
<depends refid="a" target="init" />
<depends refid="a" target="init" />
</override-target>
or better yet IMHO:
<override-target target="init">
<super refid="a" />
<super refid="b" />
</override-target>
The <super> notation feels very natural, and I don't see why one would need
to called a conflicting target (from an imported build file) from anywhere
but the same-name target that resolves the conflict...
--DD
PS: I would still like to be able to use <depends target="..."> in build
file that do not do any imports, to avoid wrapping long attributes
like the 'depends' one often is.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Conor MacNeill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 9:24 AM
> To: Ant Developers List
> Subject: Re: override
>
> <import file="a.xml" prefix="a"/>
> <import file="b.xml" prefix="b"/>
>
> <override target="a.init">
> <antcall target="b.init"/>
> </override>
>
> Thoughts?
>
> Conor
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
