Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote:
So far, I have got two +1 (myself and Jan Materne) for this proposal. The
vote will be closed tomorrow at 12:28 pm CET (20 hours from now). Three +1s
are required for a code change, so, by the likes of it, the vote will have a
negative result.

The <antfetch/>, <antcallback/>, <call/> tasks of Antelope provide
functionality in terms of returning properties. This <antreturn/> is also
returning references, so it can bring something new, plus the ease for users
who want to deploy ant, but no extra jars providing core functionality to
ant.

Since there are already tons of changes in ant 1.6 alpha, there can be some
wisdom in refusing or postponing this change.

And there is also enough work fixing small or large bugs in existing
functionality.

Cheers,

Antoine

I'm kind of neutral on the idea. I can see it has its uses, but can also see it as kind of dangerous. It is nowhere near as controlled a return mechanism as, say, a method call where unless global variables are changed, the return parameters get stuck in properties of the callers choice, not the callees.


anyway, back to fixing defects in COM objects regarding string marshalling...


--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Reply via email to