I don't think there's such a thing as experimental stuff. It's either in or
not, and once in, it must be backward compatible.
I'm sorry so few people chimed in on the subject of overloading the meaning
of ${name} in Ant. If this could be changed, then I'd have an enthusiastic
+1, but as it stands, I'm -1 or maybe -0.
--DD
I agree 100%.
I also would like some feedback on my target access modifier patch, if possble
(see http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22020)
I have mentioned this to a couple of people, including the friend who introduced me to ant in the first place and all thought the idea was good. I would like it to get in 1.6 if possible.
I am worried about the interaction between public/private and the inclusion mechanism. Will people expect object style access modifiers to work with inclusion, such that targets marked private can not be called by included content?
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
