My only reason for doing it was to make it consistent, since we had a bit of both. I figured since we were going to move these html documents to XML at some point, make the migration easier. Either way works for me.
-- Larry > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2003 5:05 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: AW: [PATCH] and problem with patch.xml > > > HTML is not XML. And while writing example is much easier to work > with " than with ". > > Maybe thatīs a default setting in the html checker :-) > > > Jan --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]