My only reason for doing it was to make it consistent, since we had a bit of
both. I figured since we were going to move these html documents to XML at
some point, make the migration easier. Either way works for me.

-- Larry

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2003 5:05 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: AW: [PATCH] and problem with patch.xml
> 
> 
> HTML is not XML. And while writing example is much easier to work
> with " than with ".
> 
> Maybe thatīs a default setting in the html checker :-)
> 
> 
> Jan

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to