On Tue, 23 Sep 2003, Philip Aston wrote: > I finally got fed up with the cost of forking a new process for every test > (~1 second in my environment). I've hacked <junit/> to support a new type > of <batchtest/> where where all of the tests are executed in a single > sub-process. *Much* faster. > > I'm quite willing to clean this up and submit it as a patch; but first > I have some questions: > > 1. Is there planned support for this already? > > 2. If not, who maintains the JUnit task, and would they like > <batchtest fork="single"/> > > 3. If they would, which version of ANT should I base the patch on?
How is this different from just specifying fork="no"? If you have more than one batchtest, does each set get forked separately? -- Jim Dixon [EMAIL PROTECTED] tel +44 117 982 0786 mobile +44 797 373 7881 --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]