> >>If macrodef attribute are to be implements as substitutions, what
> >>should be the notation? (where x is the attribute name)
> >>
> >
> > [ ] as ${x} (look like ant properties) confusion with 'real'
> > properties
> > [ ] as $(x) to close to A
> > [ ] as @x I miss the brackets
> > [ ] as ${attribute:x} too long
> > [X] as @{x} ok, close to
> A but seeable
> > different
> > [ ] some thing else nothing in my
> mind to that
>
> Has someone ruled out $${x}? Or does that conflict with
> using $$ as some kind of escape sequence for $?
That�s a part of "some thing else" :-)
But you will confound that with escaping sequence of properties.
Jan
