On Wed, 3 Dec 2003, Antoine Levy-Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I understand that there is a consensus to have macrodef use
> @{attribute} notation.
Uhm, yes. If we count your "is fine with me" as +1, we have three +1s
which would be enough for lazy consensus.
> My preference would be to turn macrodef to use @{attribute} for 1.6
> and delay local for 1.7.
Works for me.
I could also get convinced that we could introduce it in a 1.6.1
release.
> I would like the following scenario :
>
> - introduce @{attribute} in 1.6 and in HEAD,
> - fix failing testcases
> - deliver a beta3
> - introduce local in HEAD
> - deliver ant 1.6
+1
Stefan
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
