Antoine Lévy-Lambert wrote:
Steve Loughran wrote:
Antoine Lévy-Lambert wrote:
I'd argue w/ switching on march 1. That way anyone who doesnt agree with the new license has some weeks to get the old version with the old license.
-steve
Do you foresee some opposition to the new license ?
I have yet to probe. I know the lawyers were very, very, very unhappy at the original draft as its patent scope was too broad:
http://nagoya.apache.org/eyebrowse/[EMAIL PROTECTED]&msgNo=49
Do we need to vote on the subject ? Whether or not the new license should be part of 1.6.1 ?
Yes and no, :-!
Antoine
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
