On Sun, 08 Feb 2004, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > One thing that was voted on (positively, I recall), way way back in > time, was for Ant2.0 to fail on undefined properties.
Although I've never looked into it, can't you already have it with a custom PropertyHelper? If you can ensure that your custom property helper is the last one that gets called - and that it never gets called for know properties - you should be there. Provide this property helper and maybe add a new command line switch as syntactic sugar, done. > 3. But there would be a non-throwing expansion method for code that > explicitly wanted to not fail on missing strings in their . The PropertyHelper could deal with it. Stefan --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
