On Fri, 20 Feb 2004, Peter Reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I meant that the core - conditions, filters, mappers can be in > separate namespaces, but that these could still be in ant.jar, one > can have multiple antlib.xml 's in ant.jar.
Wouldn't that break backwards compatibility? <condition> <or> wouldn't work anymore as <or> would now live in a namespace different from <condition>. > Having a ant-javah.jar, ant-javac.jar ... would seem to be a bit > excessive. Agreed. > - However I assume you mean that some of the core tasks/types could > be in logical separate jars. Some middle ground. Grouping related tasks into one jar, but having no single task or type left in ant.jar. I understand that this is exactly the opposite of what you prefer. > My current feeling is that restricted types/roles are not necessary, > one can use namespaces to distingish condition <or> from selector > <or>. But only if they are not in the same namespace. They are now, or would be if they were defined as types. Stefan --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
