I'm confused.... did something I committed say something about Ant
1.3???
That article I wrote was about Ant 1.5.
Erik
On Feb 24, 2004, at 6:33 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.fawcette.com/javapro/2003_02/magazine/features/ehatcher/l
Working with Ant 1.3 and
02/2003, Ant 1.3 - seems to be old :-)
Not not invalid, īcause basics havenīt changed (so much).
Jan
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
