DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27219>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27219 <fail> in an <imported> macro outputs wrong ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-02-26 16:12 ------- I do not think this is necessary. I think the current behavior is completely fine. Can someone give me a good example why changing this will make ANT better in some sense? What is the behavior when the failure occurs inside <subant> or <antcall>? Don't we get the same stack trace as we do for <macro>? --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
