Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Mon, 15 Mar 2004, Arnaud Vandyck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >>> Honestly, I'm not sure how big our gcj user base is and how many of >>> them use <compilerarg> to pass additional arguments, the answer >>> could very well be zero. >> >> This is not a problem. I'll try to implement it myself and if the >> patch is not good for you, maybe we'll apply it only in >> Debian. > > zero was my answer to the size of the user base I was talking about, > not the chance of getting your patch into Ant 8-)
:-p <snip/> Is it possible to know the value of <compilerarg line="..."/> when I am in the gcj class? If yes, how? ... reading the sources is a good thing to answer your own questions! ;-) (well I found your code very clear!) Is it OK if in the Gcj class, I do something like: String[] argsToTest = getJavac().getCurrentCompilerArgs(); Then I think I got to test if every String begins with -o or --main? > If I'd put it towards the end of my TODO list it would likely never > get implemented ;-) I hope I'll have the time and knowledge to do it ;-) Cheers, -- ~/.signature not found < asuffield> a workstation is anything you can stick on somebodies desk and con them into using -- in #debian-devel --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]