If you didn't know either, that makes me feel somewhat better. Again, I couldn't think of an immediate use, but anything that shows signs of versatility I file away and my mind is likely to find a use for it for no better reason than that it's there... ;)
-Matt --- Dominique Devienne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > From: Matt Benson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > I was looking at the code for if/unless on targets > and > > noticed--apparently courtesy of Conor--that > properties > > substitution is perfectly operational here. It > had > > never occurred to me that it would be. So my > question > > is whether--since this behavior is consistent with > > that of virtually any other XML attribute in > Ant--that > > was something everyone took for granted, or is it > a > > little-known triviality (but a possible jewel at > that) > > that deserves some minimal form of documentation? > > Interesting. Didn't know that either. Then again, I > don't know > what convoluted logic could take advantage of it ;-) > --DD > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Small Business $15K Web Design Giveaway http://promotions.yahoo.com/design_giveaway/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]