If you didn't know either, that makes me feel somewhat
better.  Again, I couldn't think of an immediate use,
but anything that shows signs of versatility I file
away and my mind is likely to find a use for it for no
better reason than that it's there...  ;)

-Matt

--- Dominique Devienne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > From: Matt Benson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > 
> > I was looking at the code for if/unless on targets
> and
> > noticed--apparently courtesy of Conor--that
> properties
> > substitution is perfectly operational here.  It
> had
> > never occurred to me that it would be.  So my
> question
> > is whether--since this behavior is consistent with
> > that of virtually any other XML attribute in
> Ant--that
> > was something everyone took for granted, or is it
> a
> > little-known triviality (but a possible jewel at
> that)
> > that deserves some minimal form of documentation?
> 
> Interesting. Didn't know that either. Then again, I
> don't know
> what convoluted logic could take advantage of it ;-)
> --DD
> 
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 


__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Small Business $15K Web Design Giveaway 
http://promotions.yahoo.com/design_giveaway/

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to